Skip to main content

Cracking May 15, 2025 NYT Connections: A Walk‑Through, Hint Ladder, and Full Solution

Posted on May 15, 2025 — by Staff Writer

Time to Solve:12
Word Count:~234 words

Ah, the sweet allure of a puzzle that makes you ponder the very foundations of your snow knowledge! Today’s Connections brings us a delightful mix where you might find yourself questioning whether ‘crust’ is more of a baking term or if it belongs in the frosty realm of snow types. With categories ranging from the last words of operatic masterpieces to the elusive ‘real’ in various contexts, it’s a delightful brain workout. Grab your thinking caps, because we’re diving into this colorful conundrum!


What is NYT Connections?

NYT Connections is The New York Times' daily word-association puzzle that challenges you to group 16 seemingly random words into four hidden categories. Each set of Connections answers is unique, ranging from pop-culture references to tricky linguistic twists, making it a fresh brain-teaser every day. Whether you're hunting for subtle hints, full solutions, or an archive of past puzzles, our site delivers everything you need to conquer today's NYT Connections and sharpen your puzzle-solving skills.


Today's Grid

BASIS
FOUNDATION
GROUNDS
REASON
CRUST
ICE
POWDER
SLUSH
BESS
BUTTERFLY
FLUTE
SEVILLE
DEAL
ESTATE
MADRID
WORLD

Remember: the NYT shuffles the tiles each time you open the puzzle, so your on‑screen layout might differ. The words themselves, however, are identical.


Hints

No hints are available for this puzzle.


🎉 Full Solution (Spoilers Ahead!) 🎉

Nailed it in four? 🎯 Gold star! Needed a few swings first? You're in fine company—the purple decoys were downright devious today.


Strategy Spotlight: How to Approach This Puzzle

In this puzzle, solvers often find themselves stuck when trying to categorize the words correctly, especially when they encounter terms that may fit into multiple categories. A common example is the word "REASON" which can easily be confused with other logical or argumentative terms, leading solvers to second-guess their grouping. Additionally, the word "MADRID" in the context of "REAL ___" may cause hesitation, as players might mistakenly consider it a geographical term rather than recognizing its specific connection to the phrase "real estate." Such overlaps in meaning can lead to misclassification, which is a frequent pitfall in these types of puzzles.

To distinguish the real groups from plausible decoys, players should focus on the inherent characteristics of the words. For instance, in the green category of types of snow, all terms are directly related to snow conditions, whereas in the purple category, "REAL ___" specifically requires terms that are commonly associated with the concept of reality, like "DEAL" and "ESTATE." A good strategy is to look for thematic consistency within each group; if a word feels out of place or doesn’t share a clear connection with the others, it may not belong in that category.

One useful heuristic for future puzzles is to create a mental or physical list of potential categories based on the words presented. This can help in quickly eliminating options that don't fit. Additionally, when encountering words that can belong to multiple categories, prioritize those that have more definitive connections to their respective themes. For instance, if you see a word that could fit in both a logical reasoning category and a foundational category like "REASON," consider the strongest contextual clues provided by the other words in the group.


Final Thoughts

Today’s puzzle had us tiptoeing between the realms of snow and opera, with a sprinkle of real estate to boot. It was a delightful mix that kept us on our toes! Don’t forget to check back tomorrow for another round of mental gymnastics!

Happy connecting, and see you in the squares!