In the NYT Connections puzzle, solvers often encounter difficulties when dealing with words that seem to fit into multiple categories, leading to confusion. For instance, players might hesitate between the terms "BRAVE" and "FACE" when trying to categorize them under the theme of standing up to challenges. Both words can imply a confrontation, but the clearer connection to the challenge aspect lies with "CONFRONT" and "MEET". Similarly, in the purple category, words like "ROMANTIC" and "SURREAL" might cause uncertainty as both are valid art movements, but only one of them aligns perfectly with the -ISM suffix. Players might overlook the distinctiveness of the suffix requirement, which adds to the challenge of grouping correctly.

To distinguish between real groups and plausible decoys, solvers should look for defining characteristics that set words apart. In the yellow category, all words refer to basic tastes, which is a clear and common characteristic. However, players might misgroup terms like "SWEET" and "SALTY" with others that do not belong. A helpful strategy is to write out the definitions or associations of each word before attempting to group them, as this can clarify which terms share a common theme. For instance, recognizing that "Bitter" doesn't fit with the other tastes that are more universally accepted as enjoyable can help solidify the correct group.

One effective heuristic for future puzzles is to identify and focus on suffixes or prefixes that can define a group, as seen with the -ISM in the purple category. Additionally, checking for unique characteristics that are exclusive to a word can help narrow down choices. For example, when dealing with words that describe types or categories, determining if they can be classified under a broader umbrella can assist in making the right connections. Always remember to remain flexible and revisit your groupings if a particular choice feels forced, as this can lead to discovering the correct categories.