In this puzzle, solvers often get stuck when trying to categorize words that can fit into multiple groups. For example, the words "ARM" and "WING" might confuse solvers because both can refer to parts of a body or can be interpreted in different contexts, such as in anatomy or in organizational structures. Similarly, the word "SOURCE" could be misleading as it can relate to both origins and departments, making it challenging for players to commit to one classification. These ambiguities prompt hesitation and can lead to misgrouping, which is a common pitfall in NYT Connections puzzles.

To effectively distinguish the real groups from plausible decoys, solvers should focus on the specific characteristics that define each category. For instance, in the yellow group, all terms relate distinctly to sounds made by dogs, making it easier to identify them as a cohesive set. In contrast, words like "CHAPTER" or "BRANCH" in the green group are tied to organizational structures, which may not be as immediately recognizable as dog sounds. By concentrating on the unique attributes and meanings of the words, players can more readily identify which terms belong together and avoid getting sidetracked by superficial similarities.

One useful heuristic for future puzzles is to look for clear, defining characteristics that set words apart. For example, if a group involves sounds or actions, consider the context and specificity of those actions or sounds. Another strategy is to categorize words based on their associations or common usage in everyday language; this can help in quickly identifying groups. By employing these tactics, solvers can streamline the process of grouping and minimize the chances of confusion.